NWA Conference: Day 4

The 2011 Town Hall Meeting with those affected by the April 27th tornadoes.

Probably the most compelling day of the National Weather Association Conference was the public Town Hall meeting which put those affected by the April 27th tornadoes in the same room with first responders, National Weather Service meteorologists and TV broadcasters.

A cross-section of those living in the path of the Tuscaloosa-Birmingham tornado which killed 238 Alabamians (52 of those in Tuscaloosa) were invited to take part in this special Town Hall to answer questions and offer insight about how they responded to the high risk of weather dangers that unfolded that day.

Respondents in the Town Hall saw their answers immediately on big screen TV's.

Using a unique direct-response electronic device, the respondents were asked several questions including “how seriously did you take the tornado warnings that were issued” to “what was your number one source of getting word of the warnings”.  The responses showed within seconds on large screens at the Wynfrey Hotel meeting room for all of us to see.

For instance, the respondents said that NOAA weather radio and local TV was their number one source for learning of the severe weather threat and to monitor for warnings.

A few others went on to comment that they trust “the sound of the voice of their local TV weather person” in severe weather situations.  Further, the “tone of urgency” in their voice compels people to take further action.

While 60% at tonight’s Town Hall say they “sometimes expect” an actual tornado touchdown when a Tornado Warning is issued an alarming 21% say they “do not expect” a tornado to actually occur when a warning is issued.  This is where we sometimes find complacency among respondents or an “it’ll happen somewhere else” attitude.
In fact, there was one woman on the panel who said “I’ve lived here all my life and tornadoes usually happen west of I-65.”  There were a handful of the respondents that admitted they made some assumption that other parts of the area would be more affected than where they lived.

Another question posed to the panel “can there be too much time between the issuance of a warning and the actual storm?” 56% said “No”.

As a member and sealholder of the National Weather Association, I will receive a copy of the entire questionnaire and results of tonight’s Town Hall in the coming weeks.  In fact, I think it might be good to hold a version of this meeting in Southern Kentucky.  It would be interesting to see if responses to the questions would be answered differently in our area.

I’ll grant you this, tonight’s Town Hall was both enlightening and educational.  It was also humbling to hear from some of the actual victims of the tornadoes describe how they watched TV, heard the warnings, lost power and then sought shelter as best they could.

It certainly gives me a whole new perspective on how we cover the weather and I look forward to bringing some of what I’ve learned back home to you.

I’ve got another full day tomorrow including a presentation that I will give to my fellow meteorologists who use WeatherCentral products as we do at WBKO.  I will be showing other stations how to use live webcam images with Mesonet data.  Apparently, WBKO is one of the few stations in the country that does this on a regular basis!

Night y’all!

One comment

  1. One of the survey responses got me to thinking, the one about the tornado warnings and actual tornadoes. I live in the Anna community of Warren county, and over the years, I would say that perhaps hundreds of tornado warnings have been issued for the area, and I have never seen a tornado touch down, so I can understand that some folks get complacent about warnings. But what do we do about it? If you do not issue a warning and a tornado touches down people die, but then again if warnings are commonplace without tornado’s then people become complacent and possibly die.

Leave a comment